Resultados para: "FAVORITISM"

<p>all the king&#039;s servants, that were in the king&#039;s gate, bowed, and reverenced Haman--Large mansions in the East are entered by a spacious vestibule, or gateway, along the sides of which visitors sit, and are received by the master of the house; for none, except the nearest relatives or special friends, are admitted farther. There the officers of the ancient king of Persia waited till they were called, and did obeisance to the all-powerful minister of the day.

But Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence--The obsequious homage of prostration not entirely foreign to the manners of the East, had not been claimed by former viziers; but this minion required that all subordinate officers of the court should bow before him with their faces to the earth. But to Mordecai, it seemed that such an attitude of profound reverence was due only to God. Haman being an Amalekite, one of a doomed and accursed race, was, doubtless, another element in the refusal; and on learning that the recusant was a Jew, whose nonconformity was grounded on religious scruples, the magnitude of the affront appeared so much the greater, as the example of Mordecai would be imitated by all his compatriots. Had the homage been a simple token of civil respect, Mordecai would not have refused it; but the Persian kings demanded a sort of adoration, which, it is well known, even the Greeks reckoned it degradation to express. As Xerxes, in the height of his favoritism, had commanded the same honors to be given to the minister as to himself, this was the ground of Mordecai&#039;s refusal.</p>

<p>Peter opened his mouth--(See on Mat 5:2).

Of a truth I perceive--that is, &quot;I have it now demonstrated before mine eyes.&quot;

that God is no respecter of persons--Not, &quot;I see there is no capricious favoritism with God,&quot; for Peter would never imagine such a thing; but (as the next clause shows), &quot;I see that God has respect only to personal character and state in the acceptance of men, national and ecclesiastical distinctions being of no account.&quot;</p>